johnsu01 (johnsu01) wrote,
johnsu01
johnsu01

  • Music:

Chairman Mao, Chairman Bush and friends

Update: The Little Red Incident may be a hoax. See a later entry. I sure hope it is.

You've all been reading about Bush turning the spooks loose on anyone and everyone.

It's frightening that the NYT delayed publication of the story (for a year!), and frightening that they are still withholding details about it. I hope someone submits an FOIA request.

I might be open to some arguments about needing to keep certain government information secret in the interest of national security. I'm not sure. But I don't see at all how this is an example of that. We are not talking about publishing troop movements here. We are talking about publishing the basic detail that the US government is monitoring your phone calls and emails without a warrant. How would revealing that fact compromise security? Are they suggesting that the terrorists are not already operating under the assumption that their communications are being monitored? Those would be some dumb terrorists. Keeping this information secret only hurts the innocent and the law-abiding, and does nothing to actually protect security.

The only argument they have is that publishing the story would cause a backlash that would then stop the monitoring from happening, which would then put security at risk. That argument is sick and taken to its logical extreme (which is not very far from the reality), we'd have to agree that there should be no restriction on what the government does to stop what they see as a security threat. Because if they make it public, people might object to it.

The government cannot so easily be given the power to both define the threat and the scope of what needs to be done to address it. We set boundaries for them and give them the freedom to operate within those boundaries. If they need to exceed those limits, then we need to have a talk.

Don't just blame this on Bush, though. The story indicates that at least some congressional leaders may have been briefed as well. The "opposition" leaders in our government have been so weak since September 11th that I consider them wholly complicit and only slightly less responsible.

But don't neglect this story about trying to read Mao. A student requested via interlibrary loan a copy of Chairman Mao's Little Red Book. He received instead a visit from some Homeland Security thugs. They had the book with them when they showed up at his house.

So many things wrong with this. Highlighting two. One, what the hell does Chairman Mao have to do with Homeland Security? If you recall, bin Laden hates communism. He hated communism so much that we considered him a good guy. (Is that chapter still in the history books, I wonder?) Two, the rugpissers did not leave the book. They showed up with it, they left with it. The student is so frightened that he is not even talking to the media. You can bet that he did not file another request for the book. Not only did they intimidate him, they physically prevented him from reading the book!

I'm at a loss for what to do about this. Here's one idea. Anyone interested in staging a mass simultaneous filing of interlibrary loan requests for the Little Red Book?

Tags: censorship, communism, emergency administration, new york times, surveillance
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments